The Health Stacks exists to make peptide information transparent, sourced, and honest. This policy explains how our content is produced, who stands behind it, and how we keep it accurate.
Content is produced by the The Health Stacks Research Team. Our research pipeline aggregates peer-reviewed studies, clinical guidelines, and community reports, scores every claim for reliability, and links each one to its original source. Content is reviewed for accuracy against those sources before publishing. We publish under an organizational byline because that is the honest description of how the content is made — an evidence-aggregation pipeline with human editorial oversight, not a single named columnist.
We are engaging a qualified medical/scientific reviewer to formally review our health content. Until that reviewer is in place, we do not display a reviewer byline — we will not attach a credential we cannot stand behind. In the meantime, every claim remains traceable to its original source so you can verify it independently.
No claim appears without a traceable source. Each benefit, dosing note, and side effect links back to the original research paper, regulatory document, or community discussion it came from. Every source is classified into a reliability tier, and every claim inherits a 0–100 score — capped at its source tier’s ceiling, so a marketing page can never masquerade as peer-reviewed evidence. Read the full method on our methodology page.
We never present model-generated or invented data as fact — not a statistic, not a price, not a person. If we cannot trace it to a real source, it does not ship. This applies to our bylines too.
Our reliability scoring is automated and source-based. Affiliate relationships never influence a score or a ranking — see our affiliate disclosure.
Found something wrong or out of date? Tell us and we’ll fix it. Because every claim is source-linked, corrections are traceable — we update the claim against its source, not by opinion.