Our Methodology

We believe peptide information should be transparent, sourced, and honest. Here's how we do it.

1. Every Claim Has a Source

No claim appears on our site without a traceable source. Each benefit, dosing protocol, and side effect links back to the original research paper, regulatory document, or community discussion it came from. Click any ↗ source link to verify independently.

2. Reliability Scoring

Every source is classified into a reliability tier, and every claim inherits a score (0-100) based on that tier plus corroboration from other sources. Scores are capped at the source tier's ceiling — a marketing page can never claim a 95/100 reliability score, even if the text says so.

95/100Peer-ReviewedPublished in peer-reviewed journals (PubMed, PMC). The gold standard.

90/100Clinical GuidelineFrom regulators or clinical registries (FDA, EMA).

72/100Established MediaReputable reference sources (Mayo Clinic, examine.com).

60/100Specialist CommunityExpert forums and specialist communities.

40/100VendorProduct claims from sellers — treated with caution.

30/100Forum / BlogAnecdotal reports from forums and blogs.

12/100MarketingPure promotional content — lowest reliability.

3. Affiliate Transparency

We may earn a commission when you purchase through our "Where to Buy" links. This does not affect the price you pay, and it does not influence our reliability scores or content. Our scoring system is automated and source-based — affiliate relationships are separate from editorial content.

Educational content only. The Health Stacks does not provide medical advice. Peptides discussed on this site are not FDA-approved for human use unless explicitly stated. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.